The Death Penalty Debate: A Deterrence or Draconic?

South Africa faces a serious crime problem, with high rates of murder, gender-based violence, and other violent offenses. As frustration grows, some citizens and politicians have called for the reinstatement of the death penalty as a way to deter crime and restore order. South Africa abolished capital punishment in 1995, when the Constitutional Court ruled it unconstitutional. But should South Africa bring back the death penalty? and would it actually work as a deterrent to crime? Many South Africans feel that the justice system is failing, especially after the recent brutal killings of WITS student Olorato Mongale, and fourteen-year-old high school student, Likona Fose. To some, the death penalty represents justice, closure, and a strong message to potential criminals. Supporters argue that harsh punishments prevent crime. If people fear losing their lives, they may think twice before committing murder or rape. Some view the death penalty as the ultimate punishment, and believe it can act as a powerful deterrent, especially in a country with a high crime rate.

South Africa’s prisons are overcrowded, and keeping violent offenders behind bars for decades is expensive. Some argue that executing the most dangerous criminals would reduce prison costs and make space for rehabilitation of non-violent offenders. There are however arguments against the death penalty, and evidence that deterrence of this nature isn’t effective in dealing with crime or criminals. The South African Constitution protects the right to life. The Constitutional Court ruled in S v Makwanyane (1995) that the death penalty violates the rights to dignity and life. Furthermore, if a person is wrongly convicted, an execution is irreversible – a grave injustice that cannot be undone. Studies from various countries, including the U.S. and others, have shown little to no evidence that the death penalty is more effective than life imprisonment in deterring crime. South Africa’s own high murder rate during the apartheid era, when the death penalty was still in use, suggests that execution alone does not stop violent crime. In unequal societies, the justice system can be biased. Poor defendants often can’t afford good lawyers, and racial or political prejudice can influence verdicts. The death penalty could be used unjustly, especially against the vulnerable.

In a 2009 survey of top criminologists by the University of Colorado found that 88% did not believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent. In Canada, the homicide rate continued to decline after abolishing the death penalty in 1976. In South Africa, the death penalty did not prevent high murder rates in the 1980s and early 1990s, showing no clear link between capital punishment and reduced crime. The University of Cape Town criminology experts have repeatedly warned that there is no strong link between the death penalty and reduced murder rates. Bringing back the death penalty in South Africa may feel emotionally satisfying to a public plagued by violent crime, but it raises serious legal, moral, and practical concerns. There is no reliable evidence that it works as a deterrent, and it carries the risk of irreversible injustice. Instead, South Africa should focus on strengthening the criminal justice system, improving policing, and conviction rates. Moreover, investing in education and poverty reduction, and ensuring harsh but fair and constitutional penalties for violent crimes. The real solution to crime lies not in state-sanctioned execution, but in building a safer, more just, and more equal society.

Bringing back the death penalty in South Africa may feel emotionally satisfying to a public plagued by violent crime, but it raises serious legal, moral, and practical concerns. There is no reliable evidence that it works as a deterrent, and it carries the risk of irreversible injustice. Instead, South Africa should focus on strengthening the criminal justice system, improving policing, and conviction rates. Moreover, investing in education and poverty reduction, and ensuring harsh but fair and constitutional penalties for violent crimes. The real solution to crime lies not in state-sanctioned execution, but in building a safer, more just, and more equal society.